How to Write Review Comments

Notes adapted from review-writing principles learned from Paul, with personal experiences added over the years.

Why it matters:

Writing thoughtful reviews demonstrates research maturity. Good reviews show you can understand complex technical ideas, identify fundamental questions, judge novelty and rigor fairly, and write clearly. Senior researchers read reviews carefully; your writing reflects your thinking.

Keep in mind:

Be Respectful.Offer constructive criticism backed by facts, approaching reviews as you'd want to receive them yourself. The authors are human beings who worked hard on their paper.

Leave an Impression. Senior researchers read reviews carefully; writing should reflect clarity, fairness, and depth. A well-written review is a signal of your own capability.

Structure

A strong review has three parts:

I. Overview (1–2 paragraphs)

Summarize the paper's topic, problem, and proposed solution. This section should stand independently for program committees who may not read the full review. Show that you understood the paper, even if you disagree with it.

II. Main Points

Present key reasons for your recommendation in order of importance, with the most significant first. Keep comments concise and specific. Vague criticism is not useful. If you have a concern, say exactly what it is and why it matters.

III. Additional Comments

Provide secondary remarks on clarifications, improvements, and minor issues. Ensure no typos or unclear points before submission. These should be genuinely minor — do not bury a major concern here.